Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Revista E-Legis

Artigos

V. 15 N. 38 Maio/Ago. 2022

PARLIAMENTARY ACTIVITY IN THE BOLSA FAMILIA’S SUB-SYSTEM: ORGANIZED GROUPS AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RELATIONS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.51206/elegis.v15i38.770
Submitted
October 8, 2021
Published
2022-06-22

Abstract

Responding to the underrepresentation of researches concerning the politics that influence the Bolsa Família’s governance structures, such as the parliamentary politics and the interest groups, this paper identifies the patterns of collective organization among the members of this subsystem, as well as some of the organized interests that influence the design of the program. Based on the analysis of parliamentary speeches in the 55ͭ ͪ (2015-2018) and 56ͭ ͪ (2018-2020) Brazilian federal legislatures, this research explores this environment from two important theoretical backgrounds, the neoinstitutionalist and the pluralist perspectives. Using a Narrative Policy Framework methodology, it was possible to observe that some external and internal factors potentially influence the parliamentary behavior in this policy arena, and that much of the activity of groups and deputies regarding this policy can be explained by the theoretical prescriptions adopted, such as policy feedback and ideational coalitions.

References

  1. CAMPELLO, T. Audiência Pública da Comissão de Seguridade Social e Família. Sessão 61409. Brasília: Departamento de Taquigrafia, Revisão e Redação. 2021.
  2. INGRAM, H.; SCHNEIDER, A. L.; DELEON, P. Social Construction and Policy Design. In: SABATIER, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. 2. ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007. p. 93-126.
  3. JENKINS-SMITH, H. C. et al. The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research program. In: WEIBLE, C. M.; SABATIER, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. 4ª. ed. Nova York: Routledge, 2018. p. 135-171.
  4. JONES, M. D.; MCBETH, M. K. A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong? The Policy Studies Journal, Malden, v. 33, n. 2, p. 329-352, Janeiro 2010. ISSN 0190-292X.
  5. LOMELÍ, H. V. In: CIMADAMORE, A. D., et al. Estados de bienestar, derechos e ingresos básicos en América Latina. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI Editores, 2019. p. 85-104.
  6. LOWI, T. American Business, Public Policy Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics, v. 16, n. 4, p. 677-715, Julho 1964.
  7. MANCUSO, W. P.; GOZETTO, A. C. O. Lobby e políticas públicas. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora, 2018.
  8. MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN, J. P. Elaborating the ‘‘New Institutionalism’’. In: RHODES, R. A. W.; BINDER, A. S.; ROCKMAN, B. A. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 3-20.
  9. MCBETH, M. K.; SHANAHAN, E.; JONES, M. D. The Science of Storytelling: Measuring Policy Beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, v. 5, n. 18, p. 413-429, 2005. ISSN 0894-1920.
  10. PEET, R. Unholy trinity: the IMF, the world bank and the WTO. 2. ed. London: Zed Books, 2009.
  11. PIERSON, P. When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, Cambridge, v. 45, n. 4, p. 595-628, Julho 1993.
  12. PIERSON, P. Public policies as institutions. In: SHAPIRO, I.; SKOWRONEK, S.; GALVIN, D. Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State. NYC: NYU Press., 2006. p. 114-131.
  13. SABATIER, P. A.; WEIBLE, C. M. The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations, and clarifications. In: SABATIER, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. 2. ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007. p. 189-220.
  14. SCHLAGER, E. Policy making and collective action: defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, n. 28, p. 243-270, 1995.
  15. SHANAHAN, E. A. et al. A Narrative Policy Framework. In: WEIBLE, C. M.; SABATIER, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. 4ª. ed. Nova York: Routledge, 2018. p. 173-211.
  16. SKOCPOL, T. Protecting soldiers and mothers: the political origins of social policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
  17. TOMAZINI, C. G. As coalizões de causa em torno das políticas de transferências condicionadas: olhar cruzado Brasil-México. Carta Internacional , v. 5, n. 2, p. 37-55, Setembro 2016.
  18. VICENTE, V. M. B. A análise de Políticas públicas no Modelo de Coalizões de Defesa. Revista de Políticas Públicas, v. 19, n. 1, p. 77-90, 2015.
  19. WEIBLE, C. M. Why advocacy coalitions matter and practical insights about them. Policy & Politics, v. 46, n. 2, p. 325–343, 2018. ISSN 1470 8442.