Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artigos

V. 14 N. 36 Set./Dez. 2021

LIMITED VOTING IN BRAZILIAN LEGISLATIVE PROPORTIONAL ELECTIONS: A PROCEDURE TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CHOICES

DOI
https://doi.org/10.51206/elegis.v14i36.714
Submitted
June 9, 2021
Published
2021-11-03

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss how the introduction of a limited vote can benefit the achievement of efficiency in Brazilian legislative elections. The Brazilian experience with proportional voting has districts of high magnitude and a significant number of candidates, making it difficult for candidates and voters to act. We argue that if the voter had, instead of a single vote, a greater number of choices, second and third preferences could be captured, in the context of countless candidacies. Specifically, we point out, based on results in the literature, that making up to three votes available, in districts that are at least eight candidates, would increase the efficiency of public choices of legislative representatives.

References

  1. ACE Project. The Electoral Knowledge Network. Disponí­vel em: https://aceproject.org/main/english/es/ese02b.htm. Consulta em 21 de março de 2021.
  2. ARRINGTON, Theodore S.; INGALLS, Gerald L.. The limited vote alternative to affirmative districting. Political Geography, v. 17, n. 6, pp. 701-28, 1998.
  3. BRASIL. Código Eleitoral, Lei 4.737/65. 1965. Disponí­vel em: https://www.tse.jus.br/legislacao/codigo-eleitoral/codigo-eleitoral-1/codigo-eleitoral-lei-nb0-4.737-de-15-de-julho-de-1965
  4. BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasí­lia, DF: Senado Federal: Centro Gráfico, 1988
  5. BRASIL. Lei Geral das Eleições, Lei 9.504/97. 1997. Disponí­vel em: https://www.tse.jus.br/legislacao/codigo-eleitoral/lei-das-eleicoes/lei-das-eleicoes-lei-nb0-9.504-de-30-de-setembro-de-1997
  6. BRASIL. Lei 13165. 2015. Disponí­vel em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Lei/L13165.htm#art4
  7. BRASIL. Lei 13877. 2019 a. Disponí­vel em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2019/lei/L13877.htm
  8. BRASIL. Lei 13878. 2019 b. Disponí­vel em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2019/lei/L13878.htm
  9. DISS, Mostapha, TLIDI Abdelmonaim, KAMWA Eric, "On Some k-scoring Rules for Committee Elections: Agreement and Condorcet Principle. Revue d'économie politique, v. 130, pp. 699-725, 2020. Disponí­vel em: https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-revue-d-economie-politique-2020-5-page-699.htm
  10. GARG, Nikhil; GELAU, L.; Sakshuwong, SUKOLSAK; GOEL, Ashish. Who is in Your Top Three? Optimizing Learning in Elections with Many Candidates. Research Gate, Pre print., 2019. Disponí­vel em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333892336
  11. LAKEMAN, Enid; LABERT, James. Voting in democracies. London: Faber, 1995
  12. IDEA – Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Electoral Design System: The new international IDEA handbook. Avaliable in: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/electoral-system-design-the-new-international-idea-handbook.pdf
  13. LIMA JUNIOR, OLAVO BRASIL. Reformas de sistemas eleitorais: mudanças, contextos e consequências. Dados, v. 42, n. 1, 1999. Disponí­vel em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52581999000100004
  14. REYNOLDS, Andrew; REILLEY, Ben; ELLIS, Andrew. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm, Sweden: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. p. 44, 2005.
  15. THE NETHERLANDS. Regras Eleitorais para o Parlamento. 2017. Disponí­vel em: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/6/322761.pdf,
  16. TRIBUNAL SUPERIOR ELEITORAL. Estatí­sticas Eleitorais. Disponí­vel em: https://www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/estatisticas/estatisticas-eleitorais