Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Revista E-Legis

Dossiê Sistema Polí­tico Brasileiro - CEFOR / IMPA / EPRG-UnB

V. 15 N. 37 Jan./Abr. 2022

¿CUÁN DIFERENTE ES EL SISTEMA POLÍTICO BRASILEÑO? UN ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO

DOI
https://doi.org/10.51206/elegis.v15i37.741
Enviado
junio 25, 2021
Publicado
2022-03-14

Resumen

Este documento presenta una comparación actualizada del sistema político de Brasil con el de otros 33 países. Mostramos que Brasil es un caso atípico con respecto al número de partidos efectivos, el presupuesto total asignado al poder legislativo y los fondos públicos asignados a los partidos (para financiar campañas y operaciones partidarias regulares). Brasil también es el único país de nuestra muestra en el que el poder judicial organiza y supervisa el proceso electoral. También encontramos una correlación positiva entre la financiación pública total y el número total de partidos efectivos.

Citas

  1. AMES, Barry. The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. University of Michigan Press, 2001.
  2. AVELINO, George and FISCH, Arthur. Money, Elections, and Candidates. Routledge handbook of Brazilian politics, pp. 161-174, 2020.
  3. CATT, Helena, ELLIS, Andrew, MALEY, Michael, WOLF, Peter, and WALL, Alan. Electoral management design. Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2014.
  4. COLOMER, Josep M. The more parties, the greater policy stability. European Political Science 11.2, pp. 229-243, 2012.
  5. FALGUERA, Elin, JONES, Samuel, and OHMAN, Magnus. Funding of political parties and election campaigns: A handbook on political finance. IDEA, 2015.
  6. FIGUEIREDO, Argelina Cheibub and LIMONGI, Fernando. Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 32.2, pp. 151-170, 2000.
  7. LAAKSO, Markku and TAAGEPERA, Rein. “Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative political studies 12.1, pp. 3-27, 1979.
  8. LARCINESE, Valentino. Is the UK parliament too large? British Politics and Policy at LSE, 2010.
  9. MAINWARING, Scott. Politicians, parties, and electoral systems: Brazil in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics 24.1, pp. 21- 43, 1991.
  10. MAINWARING, Scott. Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil. In S. Mainwaring & M. Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, pp. 55-109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997.
  11. MAINWARING, Scott. Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: the case of Brazil. Stanford University Press, 1999.
  12. ORTUNO-ORTÍN, Ignacio, and SCHULTZ, Christian. Public Funding of Political Parties. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7.5, 781-791, 2005.
  13. PORTUGAL, Adriana Cuoco, BUGARIN, Maurício, and DAL BÓ, Ernesto. Electoral Campaign Financing: The Role of Public Contributions and Party Ideology [with Comments]. Economía 8.1, 143-77, 2007.
  14. SAMUELS, David. Incumbents and Challengers on a level playing field: assessing the impact of campaign finance in Brazil. Journal of Politics 63.2, pp. 569- 584, 2001a.
  15. SAMUELS, David. Money, Elections, and Democracy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 43.2, 27-48, 2001b.
  16. SAMUELS, David. Does Money Matter? Credible Commitments and Campaign Finance in New Democracies: Theory and Evidence from Brazil. Comparative Politics 34.1: 23-42, 2001c.
  17. TROUMPOUNIS, Orestis. On the distribution of public funding to political parties. Economics Letters, 116.3, 367-370, 2012.
  18. ZUCCO, Cesar and POWER, Timothy J. Fragmentation Without Cleavages? Endogenous Fractionalization in the Brazilian Party System. Comparative Politics 53.3, pp. 477-500, 2021.