Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé
Revista E-Legis

Dossiê Sistema Polí­tico Brasileiro - CEFOR / IMPA / EPRG-UnB

V. 15 N. 37 Jan./Abr. 2022

QUÃO DIFERENTE É O SISTEMA POLÍTICO BRASILEIRO? UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO

DOI
https://doi.org/10.51206/elegis.v15i37.741
Enviado
junho 25, 2021
Publicado
2022-03-14

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta uma comparação atualizada do sistema político brasileiro com o de 33 outros países. Mostramos que o Brasil é atípico no que diz respeito ao número de partidos efetivos, aoorçamento total do governo alocado ao poder legislativo e aos recursos públicos alocados aos partidos (para financiar campanhas e operações regulares dos partidos). O Brasil também é o único país de nossaamostra em que o judiciário organiza e supervisiona o processo eleitoral. Também encontramos uma correlação positiva entre o financiamento público total e o número total de partidos efetivos.

Referências

  1. AMES, Barry. The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. University of Michigan Press, 2001.
  2. AVELINO, George and FISCH, Arthur. Money, Elections, and Candidates. Routledge handbook of Brazilian politics, pp. 161-174, 2020.
  3. CATT, Helena, ELLIS, Andrew, MALEY, Michael, WOLF, Peter, and WALL, Alan. Electoral management design. Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2014.
  4. COLOMER, Josep M. The more parties, the greater policy stability. European Political Science 11.2, pp. 229-243, 2012.
  5. FALGUERA, Elin, JONES, Samuel, and OHMAN, Magnus. Funding of political parties and election campaigns: A handbook on political finance. IDEA, 2015.
  6. FIGUEIREDO, Argelina Cheibub and LIMONGI, Fernando. Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 32.2, pp. 151-170, 2000.
  7. LAAKSO, Markku and TAAGEPERA, Rein. “Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative political studies 12.1, pp. 3-27, 1979.
  8. LARCINESE, Valentino. Is the UK parliament too large? British Politics and Policy at LSE, 2010.
  9. MAINWARING, Scott. Politicians, parties, and electoral systems: Brazil in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics 24.1, pp. 21- 43, 1991.
  10. MAINWARING, Scott. Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil. In S. Mainwaring & M. Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, pp. 55-109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997.
  11. MAINWARING, Scott. Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: the case of Brazil. Stanford University Press, 1999.
  12. ORTUNO-ORTÍN, Ignacio, and SCHULTZ, Christian. Public Funding of Political Parties. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7.5, 781-791, 2005.
  13. PORTUGAL, Adriana Cuoco, BUGARIN, Maurício, and DAL BÓ, Ernesto. Electoral Campaign Financing: The Role of Public Contributions and Party Ideology [with Comments]. Economía 8.1, 143-77, 2007.
  14. SAMUELS, David. Incumbents and Challengers on a level playing field: assessing the impact of campaign finance in Brazil. Journal of Politics 63.2, pp. 569- 584, 2001a.
  15. SAMUELS, David. Money, Elections, and Democracy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 43.2, 27-48, 2001b.
  16. SAMUELS, David. Does Money Matter? Credible Commitments and Campaign Finance in New Democracies: Theory and Evidence from Brazil. Comparative Politics 34.1: 23-42, 2001c.
  17. TROUMPOUNIS, Orestis. On the distribution of public funding to political parties. Economics Letters, 116.3, 367-370, 2012.
  18. ZUCCO, Cesar and POWER, Timothy J. Fragmentation Without Cleavages? Endogenous Fractionalization in the Brazilian Party System. Comparative Politics 53.3, pp. 477-500, 2021.