DIMENSÕES INSTITUCIONAIS ASSOCIADAS À ABERTURA DE DADOS GOVERNAMENTAIS: UMA ANÁLISE TRANSNACIONAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51206/elegis.v15i38.752Palavras-chave:
Dados Governamentais Abertos, Governo Aberto, Dimensões Institucionais, Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação, Governos NacionaisResumo
A academia tem investigado os benefícios e barreiras da adoção dos dados governamentais abertos (DGA). Todavia, há lacunas teóricas sobre a influência dos fatores institucionais sobre os DGA. Logo, o objetivo do estudo é analisar o relacionamento entre as dimensões institucionais e o nível de abertura de dados governamentais em diferentes países. Para isso, adotou-se abordagem quantitativa, utilizando dados secundários e modelo de regressão linear. Evidenciou-se que o desempenho das iniciativas de DGA associam-se com o grau de existência de uma política pública específica para DGA, a existência de uma lei de acesso à informação, o desenvolvimento dos programas de governo eletrônico, a participação do país na Open Government Partnership e a qualidade administrativa do governo. Portanto, para além dos desafios técnicos, as características das dimensões institucionais de cada país fazem o padrão de implementação e o desempenho das iniciativas nacionais de DGA variarem caso a caso.
Referências
ALBANO, Claudio Sonaglio; REINHARD, Nicolau. Desafios para governos e sociedade no ecossistema brasileiro de dados governamentais abertos (DGA). Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, v. 20, n. 67, 2015.
ALLISON, Paul D. Multiple Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks. Pine Forge Press, 1999.
ALTAYAR, Mohammed Saleh. Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective. Government Information Quarterly, v. 35, n. 4, p.633-643, 2018.
BROWN, D. Electronic government and public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 71, n. 2, p. 241–254, 2005.
CINGOLANI, Luciana; THOMSSON, Kaj; CROMBRUGGHE, Denis de. Minding Weber More Than Ever? The Impacts of State Capacity and Bureaucratic Autonomy on Development Goals. World Development, v. 72, p. 191-207, 2015.
DAVIES, Tim; PERINI, Fernando; ALONSO, Jose. Researching the emerging impacts of open data. ODDC Working Papers. World Wide Web Foundation. 2013.
DAVIES, Tim; PERINI, Fernando. Researching the emerging impacts of open data: revisiting the ODDC conceptual framework. The Journal of Community Informatics, v. 12, n. 2, p.148-178, 2016.
DAVIES, Tim. Open data policies and practice: An international comparison. In: European Consortium for Political Research Conference, 8., 2014, Glasgow. 8th European Consortium for Political Research Conference. Glasgow, 2014. p. 1-26.
DIMAGGIO, Paul J.; POWELL, Walter W.. The Iron Cage Revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, 1983.
EVANS, Peter. Embedded Autonomy. Princeton. Princeton University Press, 1995.
FOUNTAIN, Jane E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
FUKUYAMA, Francis. What is Governance? Governance, v. 26, n. 3, p.347-368, 2013.
GONZÁLEZ-ZAPATA, Felipe; HEEKS, Richard. The Challenges of Institutionalising Open Government Data: a historical perspective of Chile’s OGD initiative and digital government institutions. In: VAN SCHALKWYK, François; VERHULST, Stefaan G.; MAGALHAES, Gustavo; PANE, Juan; WALKER, Johanna (ed.). The Social Dynamics of Open Data. Cape Town: African Minds, 2017. p. 13-34.
GONZALEZ-ZAPATA, Felipe R. The Influence of Political Institutions and Power on Open Government Data (OGD): a case study of the chilean OGD initiative. 2017. 328 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Curso de Doutorado em Ciência Política. Global Development Institute School of Environment, Education nd Development, Universidade de Manchester, Manchester, 2017.
GUJARATI, Damodar N.; PORTER, Dawn C. Econometria Básica. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Amgh Editora Ltda., 2011.
HAIR, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th. ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall International, 2005.
HARRISON, Teresa M.; GUERRERO, Santiago; BURKE, G. Brian; COOK, Meghan; CRESSWELL, Anthony; HELBIG, Natalie; HRDINOVA, Jana; PARDO, Theresa. Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, v. 17, n. 2, p. 83-97, 2012.
HENNINGER, Maureen. Reforms to counter a culture of secrecy: open government in australia. Government Information Quarterly, v. 35, n. 3, p. 398-407, 2018.
JANSSEN, Marijn; CHARALABIDIS, Yannis; ZUIDERWIJK, Anneke. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, v. 29, n. 4, p.258-268, 2012.
KALAMPOKIS, Evangelos; TAMBOURIS, Efthimios; TARABANIS, Konstantinos. A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, v. 6, n. 3, p.1-20, 2011.
KASSEN, Maxat. Open data and its institutional ecosystems: A comparative cross‐jurisdictional analysis of open data platforms. Canadian Public Administration, v. 61, n. 1, p. 109-129, 2018.
KELLSTEDT, Paul; WHITTEN, Guy. The Fundamentals of Political Science Research. 2. ed. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
LUNA-REYES, Luis F.; NAJAFABADI, Mahdi M. The US open data initiative: the road ahead. Information Polity, v. 24, n. 2, p. 163-182, 2019.
MARCH, James G.; OLSEN, Johan P. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press, 1989.
MARTIN, Chris. Barriers to the open government data agenda: Taking a multi‐level perspective. Policy & Internet, v. 6, n. 3, p. 217-240, 2014.
MATHEUS, Ricardo; RIBEIRO, Manuella Maia; VAZ, José Carlos. Strategies and instruments for the dissemination and promotion of open government data use in Brazil: case study of Rio de Janeiro city hall. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade, Curitiba, v. 14, n. 33, p.172-189, 2018.
NORTH, Douglass. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP. Open Government Partnership - Members. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/our-members/. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2019.
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP. Open Government Declaration. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/process/joining-ogp/open-government-declaration/ . Acesso em: 12 mar. 2021.
PETERS, B. Guy. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The 'New Institutionalism'. Pinter, 1999.
POSSAMAI, Ana Júlia. Dados Abertos no Governo Federal Brasileiro: desafios de transparência e interoperabilidade. 2016. 300 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Política, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2016.
PURON-CID, Gabriel. Factors for a successful adoption of budgetary transparency innovations: a questionnaire report of an open government initiative in Mexico. Government Information Quarterly, v. 31, p. 49-62, 2014.
ROSNAY, Melanie Dulong de; JANSSEN, Katleen. Legal and Institutional Challenges for Opening Data across Public Sectors: towards common policy solutions. Journal of Theoretical And Applied Electronic Commerce Research, v. 9, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2014.
ROTHSTEIN, Bo; TEORELL, Jan. What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165-190, 2008.
SAFAROV, Igbal; MEIJER, Albert; GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, Stephan. Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2017.
SAFAROV, Igbal. Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 42, n. 2, p.305-328, 2019.
SAYOGO, Djoko Sigit; PARDO, Theresa A.; COOK, Meghan. A Framework for Benchmarking Open Government Data Efforts. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p.1896-1905, 2014.
SEWADEH, Mirvat; SISSON, Jeffrey. Disseminating Government Data Effectively in the Age of Open Data. Federal Data Science, p.13-28, 2018.
UNITED NATIONS. Sustainable Development Goals Indicators Database. 2016. Disponível em: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database. Acesso em: 02 jan. 2020.
UNITED NATIONS. UN E-Government Survey 2016. 2016. Disponível em: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2020.
UNITED NATIONS. UN Data. 2021. Disponível em: http://data.un.org/. Acesso em: 04 mar. 2021.
VAN SCHALKWYK, Francois; WILLMERS, Michelle A.; SCHONWETTER, Tobias. Institutionalizing Open Data in Government. SSRN Electronic Journal, p. 1-23, 2016.
VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY. V-Dem Dataset V6. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/archive/previous-reference-materials/reference-material-v6/. Acesso em: 05 jun. 2020.
VELJKOVIĆ, Nataša; BOGDANOVIĆ-DINIĆ, Sanja; STOIMENOV, Leonid. Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly, v. 31, n. 2, p.278-290, 2014.
WEB FOUNDATION. Open Data Barometer, 4th Edition. 2016. Disponível em: <https://opendatabarometer.org/4thedition/?_year=2016&indicator=ODB>. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.
WEB FOUNDATION. Open Data Barometer 4th edition - Research Handbook. 2016b. Disponível em: https://opendatabarometer.org/doc/4thEdition/ODB-4thEdition-ResearchHandbook.pdf. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2020.
WEB FOUNDATION. Open Data Barometer 4th edition: Primary Data - Context and Impact. 2016. Disponível em: https://opendatabarometer.org/data/4thEdition/ODB-4thEdition-PrimaryData-Context-Impact.csv. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2020.
YANG, Tung-mou; LO, Jin; SHIANG, Jing. To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data. Journal of Information Science, v. 41, n. 5, p.596-612, 2015.
YANG, Tung-Mou; WU, Yi-Jung. Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies' open data publication: a study in taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, v. 33, n. 3, p. 378-392, 2016.
YU, H.; ROBINSON, D. G. The new ambiguity of ―open government. UCLA Law Review Discourse, Los Angeles, v. 59, p.178-208, 2012.
ZUIDERWIJK, Anneke; JANSSEN, Marijn. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, v. 31, n. 1, p.17-29, 2014.
ZUIDERWIJK, Anneke; JANSSEN, Marijn; CHOENNI, Sunil; MEIJER, Ronald. Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, v. 8, n. 2, p. 185-204, 2014.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 E-Legis - Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Câmara dos Deputados
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A E-Legis se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a credibilidade do veículo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.
Aprovados os artigos, os autores deverão assinar termo de autorização para publicação na Revista E-Legis, em que cedem, a título gratuito e em caráter definitivo, os direitos autorais patrimoniais decorrentes.
Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser propriedade da Revista E-Legis, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial sujeita a autorização expressa da revista. Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a E-Legis.
A Comissão Editorial da E-Legis não se compromete a devolver as colaborações recebidas.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
COPYRIGHT STATEMENT
E-Legis reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals, in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the authors' writing style. Conceptual changes, corrections or suggestions will be sent to the authors, when necessary.
Once the articles are approved, the authors must sign an authorization term for publication in the E-Legis journal, in which they grant, free of charge and permanently, the resulting patrimonial copyright.
Published works become the property of E-Legis, with total or partial reprinting subject to the magazine's express authorization. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication, in this case E-Legis, must be consigned.
The Editorial Committee of E-Legis does not undertake to return the contributions received.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DECLARACIÓN DE DERECHOS DE AUTOR
E-Legis se reserva el derecho de realizar cambios normativos, ortográficos y gramaticales en los originales, con el fin de mantener el estándar culto del lenguaje y la credibilidad del vehículo. Sin embargo, respetará el estilo de escritura de los autores. Los cambios conceptuales, correcciones o sugerencias se enviarán a los autores, cuando sea necesario.
Una vez que se aprueban los artículos, los autores deben firmar un término de autorización para su publicación en la Revista E-Legis, en el que otorgan, de forma gratuita y permanente, los derechos de autor patrimoniales resultantes.
Las obras publicadas pasan a ser propiedad de Revista E-Legis, y la reimpresión total o parcial está sujeta a la autorización expresa de la revista. En todas las citas posteriores, la fuente original de publicación, en este caso E-Legis, debe ser consignada.
El Comité Editorial de E-Legis no se compromete a devolver las contribuciones recibidas.
