E-Legis − Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Câmara dos Deputados https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis <p>The Electronic Journal <em>E-Legis</em> (ISSN: 2175-0688) is a scientific journal published quarterly, since 2008, under the Graduate Program of the Chamber of Deputies (PPG/CD). The journal disseminates research results focused on relevant topics in the field of legislative studies and has established itself as a national reference in the area. The <em>E-Legis</em> has editions in Portuguese, English, and Spanish and receives manuscripts throughout the year in a continuous flow system.</p> pt-BR <p>A E-Legis se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da lí­ngua e a credibilidade do veí­culo. Respeitará, no entanto, o estilo de escrever dos autores. Alterações, correções ou sugestões de ordem conceitual serão encaminhadas aos autores, quando necessário.</p> <p>Aprovados os artigos, os autores deverão assinar termo de autorização para publicação na Revista E-Legis, em que cedem, a tí­tulo gratuito e em caráter definitivo, os direitos autorais patrimoniais decorrentes.</p> <p>Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser propriedade da Revista E-Legis, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial sujeita a autorização expressa da revista. Em todas as citações posteriores, deverá ser consignada a fonte original de publicação, no caso a E-Legis.</p> <p>A Comissão Editorial da E-Legis não se compromete a devolver as colaborações recebidas.</p> <p><strong>___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</strong></p> <p><strong>COPYRIGHT STATEMENT</strong></p> <p>E-Legis reserves the right to make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes to the originals, in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language and the credibility of the vehicle. However, it will respect the authors' writing style. Conceptual changes, corrections or suggestions will be sent to the authors, when necessary.</p> <p>Once the articles are approved, the authors must sign an authorization term for publication in the E-Legis journal, in which they grant, free of charge and permanently, the resulting patrimonial copyright.</p> <p>Published works become the property of E-Legis, with total or partial reprinting subject to the magazine's express authorization. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication, in this case E-Legis, must be consigned.</p> <p>The Editorial Committee of E-Legis does not undertake to return the contributions received.</p> <p>______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p> <p><strong>DECLARACIÓN DE DERECHOS DE AUTOR</strong></p> <p>E-Legis se reserva el derecho de realizar cambios normativos, ortográficos y gramaticales en los originales, con el fin de mantener el estándar culto del lenguaje y la credibilidad del vehí­culo. Sin embargo, respetará el estilo de escritura de los autores. Los cambios conceptuales, correcciones o sugerencias se enviarán a los autores, cuando sea necesario.</p> <p>Una vez que se aprueban los artí­culos, los autores deben firmar un término de autorización para su publicación en la Revista E-Legis, en el que otorgan, de forma gratuita y permanente, los derechos de autor patrimoniales resultantes.</p> <p>Las obras publicadas pasan a ser propiedad de Revista E-Legis, y la reimpresión total o parcial está sujeta a la autorización expresa de la revista. En todas las citas posteriores, la fuente original de publicación, en este caso E-Legis, debe ser consignada.</p> <p>El Comité Editorial de E-Legis no se compromete a devolver las contribuciones recibidas.</p> e-legis@camara.leg.br (Equipe editorial) sepes.cefor@camara.leg.br (Comissão editorial) Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0300 OJS 3.3.0.11 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Editorial https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/885 <p>Editorial - E-Legis - v. 17 - n. 42</p> Fabiano Peruzzo Schwartz Copyright (c) 2025 Fabiano Peruzzo Schwartz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/885 Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0300 Créditos https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/886 <p>Créditos - E-Legis - v. 17 - n. 42</p> Copyright (c) 2025 E-Legis – Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Câmara dos Deputados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/886 Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0300 Public policies, democracy and racism: the role of civil society in the CNPIR https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/825 <p>This article analyzes the struggle for social rights carried out by representatives of civil society in the National Council for Racial Equality (CNPIR). It is a space for social participation that includes representatives of social movements and non-governmental organizations, as well as government representatives. This qualitative research was carried out from 2018 to 2021, through interviews with CNPIR members who represent civil society and document analysis of official meeting records, as well as on-site visits. The following indicators were used based on these data: associative trajectory, representativeness and activism. It was found that counselors fight for social rights by facing structural racism associated with their own associative and participatory trajectory within the Council. The identity in the social struggles and the recognition of the heterogeneity of these counselors is an important result from the analyzed data, as they are subjects who recognized themselves in the struggle, in the difference, and with the same agenda: facing structural racism, fighting for more public policies to the blacks, to articulate<br />with the social movements, in particular with the Black Movement, in the search for the expansion of social rights, and access and expansion of public policies in a universal way.</p> Felipe Portela Bezerra, Ângela Vieira Neves Copyright (c) 2025 E-Legis – Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Câmara dos Deputados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/825 Fri, 21 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0300 Janus divided: a bibliometric review of the brazilian literature on parties and public policies https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/858 <p>Representative democracies need public policies and political parties. This results in a combination in which Political Science should act as an epistemic field. In this sense, this article performs a systematic bibliographic review on the relationship between political parties and public policies. From the Scielo platform, data were collected on articles that dealt with the subject. After that, Zotero, N-Vivo and VOSviewer programs were used to perform the analysis. It was found that political parties are more closely related to elections, party systems and political careers, while public policies are more closely related to bureaucracies, state capabilities and judicialization. Furthermore, the results indicate that the fields of studies of public policies and political parties have a very little relationship between them, with few articles making a joint articulation between the two terms. In this way, the need to fill this gap is affirmed, making a necessary study agenda for future generations of political scientists.</p> André Marenco, Maurí­cio Michel Rebello Copyright (c) 2025 E-Legis – Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Câmara dos Deputados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/858 Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 -0300 Communication and media in the Brazilian and Portuguese constitutional orders https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/871 <p>The article aims to analyze, from a comparative perspective, how the topic of communication and media is addressed in the current constitutions of Brazil (CRFB/1988) and Portugal (CRP/1976). It begins by contextualizing the role of the media in general and presents criticisms of the practice of journalism in Brazil. Against this backdrop, the need to improve the functioning of media-related institutions in Brazil is highlighted. The analysis of the constitutional treatment of this issue in democratic countries emerges as a particularly relevant alternative for properly addressing it. Through a literature review and analysis of the constitutional texts, it is observed that, despite several similarities, the Brazilian and Portuguese constitutions differ especially in their approach to the regulation of the media sector.</p> Gustavo Melione Abreu, Marco Antonio Pessoa Veloso Copyright (c) 2025 E-Legis − Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Câmara dos Deputados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://e-legis.camara.leg.br/cefor/index.php/e-legis/article/view/871 Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 -0300